Tag: Vulnerability Databases
-
MITRE’s Phoning in New CNAs

On December 17, 2024, MITRE announced five new CVE Numbering Authorities (CNA) on their Twitter feed as well as their news page. However, there were actually seven added according to the CNAs page based on tracking it daily. Last year, when I asked about a discrepancy in tracking the CNAs, MITRE promptly replied to clarify.…
-
Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Thoughts – Part One

This is the first of two blogs with my thoughts on Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) tracking and the challenges that come with tracking them. Introduction On November 03, 2021, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) announced a Binding Operational Directives (BOD) titled “BOD 22-01: Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities“. This BOD established…
-
Vulnerability Forecasting Technical Colloquium – A Few Thoughts

[I wrote this on September 21st, but apparently forgot to ultimately move from GDoc to Blog. I suspect because it really needs to be cleaned up as it is my first draft. Rather than do that, since the event has passed, I will just backdate instead. This blog was actually published December 28, 2024.] Part…
-
400 CNAs, Yay?

Introduction This week, or in the next two, we’re likely to see MITRE heralding the milestone of minting their 400th CVE Numbering Authority (CNA). These are, primarily, organizations that can assign a CVE ID without having to go to MITRE each time to obtain the ID. This is part of what MITRE calls a “federated”…
-
GVD Discussion – Round Two

Tom Alrich published a blog titled “The Global Vulnerability Database won’t be a “database” at all” on November 10, 2023. In the blog Tom lays out some ideas for how this “database” would operate and the advantages he sees. I didn’t see this blog until early May and posted my “Thoughts on Tom Alrich’s “Global…
-
Thoughts on Tom Alrich’s “Global Vulnerability Database”

Tom Alrich published a blog last year titled “The Global Vulnerability Database won’t be a “database” at all“. It is basically his outline for how to make an international database that many can contribute to, to replace the inadequate CVE / NVD database. He said he welcomes any comments and when it comes to vulnerability…
-
VulnCon: NVD Symposium, Answers, and More Concerns

Yesterday, at the first inaugural VulnCon, Tanya Brewer from the NVD gave a presentation that was listed on the agenda as “NVD Symposium”. At the talk, her slides began with a header “The National Vulnerability Database: Exploring Opportunities”. However, neither the symposium nor the opportunities were the primary topics that most people were interested in.…
-
2024 and Some Still Don’t Understand the CVE Ecosystem

[Update: Even before I publish this, I want to keep everything I wrote for now. But I believe this rebuttal is in response to trash written by SpiceWorks and a GPT.] The world of vulnerability disclosures is growing fast, for a variety of reasons I won’t get into. Suffice it to say my time is…
-
That Vulnerability is “Trending” … a Redux

A couple weeks ago I published a blog titled “That Vulnerability is ‘Trending’ … So What?“. I didn’t think I would be publishing another on this topic, especially this fast. But I ran into another absurd case of a vulnerability “trending” and figured out why, which is even more ridiculous. I caused this… A CVE…
-
Rebuttal? Not really… Comments on Curphey’s Latest Blog

I went into a LinkedIn post expecting to have to buy a new box of red sharpies to be honest, but I am pleasantly surprised at the conclusions regarding CVE / NVD, which I think are largely accurate. As grim a picture as is painted, they are still a bit too generous. I say that…